Our mission is to increase prosperity among believers. The Bible lays out a path to prosperity, but that the state leads people to the law. The state is a liar and a deceiver and a destroyer. Those who lack faith, come under the law. The church is built in the spirit and destroyed by the flesh under the law.
If we love our child, we protect them from things that would harm them. Parental care cannot be made consistent with a progressive tolerant mindset. The person who is tolerant of sin is uncommitted and irresponsible. We see this more clearly when it comes to caring for a child, but to be blasé about sin is to be blasé about the condition of society, and this invariably impacts our children’s lives.
We have papers that say we own land given to us by a government that claims it owns the natural resources within its borders. But the nation must stand ready to defend this claim against all enemies foreign and domestic with guns and other appliances of terror. How credible are claims of ownership to what is found? Is ownership simply a matter of finder’s keepers or is there a deeper meaning to the idea of ownership?
Apriorian Apologetics justifies faith by means of works of the spirit that create wealth. Our mission is to increase prosperity among believers, proving not only that the Bible contains advanced techniques for creating wealth, but that the state leads people astray. The state is a liar and a deceiver and destroyer leading even the elect i
Apriorian Apologetics justifies faith by means of works of the spirit that create wealth. Our mission is to increase prosperity among believers, proving not only that the Bible contains advanced techniques for creating wealth, but that the state leads people astray. The state is a liar and a deceiver and destroyer leading even the elect into the laws that are of the flesh. The church is built by believers coming together in faith. If we sin, we fall short of the glory of God. If we lack faith, we come to the law giver and the law provider, and this is the state. We build the church in the spirit and the church is destroyed by the flesh under the law. Wealth is spiritual and it is ecumenical. The fruit of the spirit is the equity created by the church, for the church and this the world calls wealth. This is the fruit even the world wants.
Apriorian Apologetics values faith and the church and the only way of life that leads to prosperity. We are worthy of our wealth as we are worthy of our wages. We value truth. We believe truth is measurable and scientifically verifiable by means of the prosperity it produces. We value also, the doctrine of subsidiarity and the labor theor
Apriorian Apologetics values faith and the church and the only way of life that leads to prosperity. We are worthy of our wealth as we are worthy of our wages. We value truth. We believe truth is measurable and scientifically verifiable by means of the prosperity it produces. We value also, the doctrine of subsidiarity and the labor theory of value. Apriorian values the experimental method. We value objectivity, which is the ability to discern what works and what is redundant. We value science and its ability to discern the most direct path to an outcome. Apriorian values parsimony. Truth is parsimonious. The path to truth eliminates waste and, in the process, eliminates the state. Apriorian values logic and morality and the Biblical path to wealth.
Apriorian Apologetics shows you the door to the Third Way: the Biblical path to wealth. There is the Biblical way and the worlds way. The world rewards the rich and the poor, the Biblical path rewards those whom the world knows as the middle class and those who work with the hands. One path is faith based and bear’s fruit. The other way
Apriorian Apologetics shows you the door to the Third Way: the Biblical path to wealth. There is the Biblical way and the worlds way. The world rewards the rich and the poor, the Biblical path rewards those whom the world knows as the middle class and those who work with the hands. One path is faith based and bear’s fruit. The other way is defined by the state and is regulated by law. The Biblical path constitutes a suite of solutions that solves all social problems. The path of the state inevitably leads to globalism. If you, your church or community is experiencing social problems, you are tolerating evil. If you cannot afford to fix the social problems in your jurisdiction, you are tolerating parasitism that is eating up your wealth. We do no more than help you open the door to the Third Way.
A theory of everything is a claim to answer all human problems with the use of a single hypothetical or explanatory element. In this case the explanatory factor is God or what is called The God Hypothesis. Apriorian claims God Exists and that because He Exists as God He is the author of all things. There remains only one option available to us, add value to the things of God, or create enmity between Him and us. If we are against God we are against the things of God. This is witness as competition. To compete one or two persons must compete with the rightful owner or with another false claimant to what does not belong to either. To solve human problems is simply a matter of not creating them. Conservatives are organizations that reward cooperation and prevent competitions from occurring. Thus all human social problems are simultaneously eliminated.
There are two systems of thought or ideologies, that reflect two philosophies or epistemologies as to the nature of knowledge. If our view as to what knowledge is are wrong, the truth is far from us.
The One Reality Hypothesis postulates a single all-encompassing universe that is known only through the physical sense. This is the phenomenologists position.
The Two Reality Hypothesis acknowledges there is an epistemology that contains all logical possibilities but one. The excluded hypothesis is the proposition that the universe is composed of absolute truths. Logically there cannot be more than two possible Theories of Knowledge, nor can there be fewer than one, as the one is needed and includes all logical possibilities but one other. Thus, the one philosophy is logically necessary and the two reality hypothesis is sufficient to include all possible viewpoints.
In The Two Universe model, one universe contains all possible ideas and viewpoints, other than the idea that truth is formed from logical absolutes. As the idea of a reality composed of contingent truths is incompatible with a reality of absolutes, a reality composed of analytical truths cannot be contained in one that is composed of a posteriori truth. The two realities are logical contradictions and therefore produce two totally different understanding of knowledge.
If there is only one knowable reality, absolute truth statements are not tenable. The One Reality Hypothesis must exclude all absolute statements and all metaphysical propositions. This statement is an absolute truth and is metaphysical in its construction. But we do understand it even though its construction is at odds with the proposition there are no absolute knowable truths.
The claim no absolute truths are knowable cannot be deduced from the One Reality Hypothesis. The One Reality Hypothesis contradicts its own premise, namely that it is all-inclusive. In fact, the One Reality Hypothesis cannot contain its own definition. The definition of the One Reality Hypothesis is a metaphysical construct and not admissible by the standards it establishes for what is knowable or permissible.
All true propositions are absolute truths. That which is not true is false. The claim there is no absolute truth, is a proposition that claims no class of propositions exist that is without at least one exception. This is an absolute truth claim. This claim is not permissible under the rules laid down by the One Reality Hypothesis. Statements that have no exceptions, are not compatible with The One Reality Hypothesis. The One Reality Hypothesis posits or represents, a logical impossibility. The One Reality Hypothesis permits of no absolute truths. Therefore, the conclusion must be, there are two incompatible and logical contradictory, Theories of Knowledge.
One reality or knowledge system is composed of relative statements, ideas and concepts. The truths of liberal reality are contingent, probabilistic and relative. The truths of The One Reality Hypothesis always contain an element of doubt and by extension, error. There is no moral perfection possible within the liberal conception of life.
The other Theory of Knowledge or reality construct is the reality that contains logical truth. It excludes all synthetic statements made by The One Reality Hypothesis in a category of things called lies. In a reality in which absolutes are possible, moral perfection becomes possible.
· The One Reality Hypothesis includes all narratives other than belief there are two realities.
· The One Reality Hypothesis (ORH) rejects the claims of the Two Reality Hypothesis (TRH).
· Two Reality Hypothesis affirms part truth exists as lies.
· The TRH postulates a false and contradictory reality composed of synthetic statements and a posteriori reasoning exists as a belief held by those who reject God.
· The TRH also postulates there is an analytical reality based on logical thought and a priori statements arrived at deductively.
· The TRH embraces metaphysics, and logic and the possibility of moral perfection.
· The Two Reality Hypothesis, postulates God Exists is a foundational axiom and the most basic analytical claim.
· The two realities have and must have two disparate ideas on rights and the exercise of power.
· The TRH postulates labor has an absolute moral right to the value it creates and absolute moral authority over this value.
· Those who hold to the ethical ideas derived from the ORH believe there are no natural rights to authority. Position is determined by competitions.
· The Six Moral Maxims state:
o No one is entitled to what others have.
o No one is entitled to the service of another.
o No one is obligated to anyone else.
o No one must pay the cost of others.
o We have a right only to what we create.
o We have absolute authority over the value we create.
The power of the state justifies its costs, including taxation, unemployment, poverty and pollution. Without the regulatory power of the state there are no social costs because without its regulatory power the stat cannot claim the right to externalize its costs onto others. Where there are social costs there is no social justice. When we have social justice there is no need for the state.
The Apriorian Thesis
There is nothing that puzzles mankind more than the existence of evil. How can a Perfect God create evil? But these problems are of our own making. God is not the only creator. It says God created all things and on the seventh day, He rested. But mankind existed by then and mankind did not rest. All we need to understand to solve the dilemma of evil, is to know God does not lie, what God Created is Good. Man cannot turn the Good God does, into evil.