Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
“a theology for the spiritually mature ”
There are only two ways to live. The unforgiveable sin is to be a spiritual infant. Infantilism is the source of all evil. The mission of every true Christian is to grow up, in faith. The church is our home, the place where maturity begins. If we do not grow spiritually, neither does the church. This is our theology.
Even the left accepts there is evil, even if they think evil is someone on the right denying people have the ability to decide what moral code they will live up to. The key to understanding evil is to understand it is not subjective. Our gut is not a device that registers how wrong something is. That is just our own response to something we think will impact us on a personal level. A comment is not evil simply because it offends us. Indeed, if evil cannot be measured, it is not evil. A value that is not measurable, has no true existence. A person cannot be good or evil if the level of their depravity does not have a quantifiable correlate. The key to understanding evil is understanding its quantifiability.
There is good and evil and therefore, there is evil among us. We all know this regardless of how we think of evil, or where we think it originated from. Interesting, whether we are Christian or atheist, we have to conclude the center of evil is in the state.
The mission of Apriorian Apologetics is to reach spiritual maturity. Our goal is to create spiritually mature Christians. This is the only way to defeat evil. Spiritual maturity is our first goal. Spiritual infantilism is the philosophy that sees the state as the central and necessary and paternalistic, institution.
Our second goal is to
The mission of Apriorian Apologetics is to reach spiritual maturity. Our goal is to create spiritually mature Christians. This is the only way to defeat evil. Spiritual maturity is our first goal. Spiritual infantilism is the philosophy that sees the state as the central and necessary and paternalistic, institution.
Our second goal is to defeat parasites. The worker is worthy of his wages and a man that will not work, neither shall he eat. To be perfected is to become spiritually mature.
The third goal is to establish a single and consolidated measure to gauge the rate and degree of a person’s spiritual maturity. The just war is waged against spiritual infants. Evil wants us weak. Without power disparities there is no state and no need for the state. The spiritually mature do not require a state.
Fourthly, our goal is to harden the soft sciences and create a unified theory of everything, consistent with Scripture. Scripture answers every problem known to man, implicitly or explicitly including the Ten Great Evils.
And fifthly, our mission is to ensure Christians are not yoked unequally with the unbeliever. Even to taking the stake out of our own eye. The problems of Christians are of our making, to be solved by spiritual growth. The spiritually mature pay for their mistakes.
Apriorian Apologetics, as a sixth goal, is to serve as the experimental proof that God exists. The spiritually mature are the Test Group. The state and its subjects serve as the Control Group. Apriorians ultimate mission is to overcome spiritual infantilim.
Apriorian Apologetics values spiritual maturity above all things. Our first priority, and last, is to grow from spiritual infancy to spiritual maturity. We value the spiritually mature church, as the reflection of our own spiritual growth.
We value logic and scripture and science and the tools that guide us on the pathway to truth.
Aprioria
Apriorian Apologetics values spiritual maturity above all things. Our first priority, and last, is to grow from spiritual infancy to spiritual maturity. We value the spiritually mature church, as the reflection of our own spiritual growth.
We value logic and scripture and science and the tools that guide us on the pathway to truth.
Apriorian values the scientific method and the narrow way. This is the analytical way to truth. We value those who employ Scripture, faith and the scientific method to make us accountable to each other, to God and to truth.
We value the methods of science coupled with the logic of analytics as a way for us to exercise maturity in the faith.
We value work and those who work. We value productive persons for those who work are those who are spiritually mature.
Apriorian embraces communities of spiritually mature persons. As a community we embrace the ideas of syndicalism, the doctrine of subsidiarity, the labor theory of value, as well as logic and morality and analytical thought.
The spiritually mature oppose reconciliation with the state, the spiritually mature reject compromise, and all negotiated settlements with the enemies of Christ, the spiritually mature abjure the lukewarm church and those who seek to turn the other cheek, when dealing with demonic forces. The spiritually mature reject parasites and those who embrace the forces of darkness. All that we reject are the things embraced by spiritual infants.
Apriorian Apologetics is a theology for the spiritually mature. Apriorian is a community for the spiritually mature. This is a spiritual community that manifests real time churches as a threshold is reached. As is the case for all those who are mature, we work to educate the immature and guide the spiritually young into a pathway to matur
Apriorian Apologetics is a theology for the spiritually mature. Apriorian is a community for the spiritually mature. This is a spiritual community that manifests real time churches as a threshold is reached. As is the case for all those who are mature, we work to educate the immature and guide the spiritually young into a pathway to maturity. It is a process.
The mature church is a spiritually mature community. Apriorian theology eliminates all hierarchy and power disparities. The spiritually mature do not need overseers. The spiritually mature are not looking to exploit the weaknesses of others. The spiritually mature desire to be equal players in their community and to give as much or more, than they take.
Apriorian Missions are local organizations dedicated to promoting spiritual maturity. Being spiritually mature solves the Ten Great Evils. If no one is free loading, there is no unemployment, debt, poverty, inflation, pollution, waste, taxation, homelessness, war, and injustice. Nor can these evils exist without the participation and enabling activities, of the state.
If you, your church or community is experiencing social problems, your community is a victim of spiritual infantilism. Apriorian Elders can help you through this.
A theory of everything is a claim to answer all human problems with the use of a single hypothetical or explanatory element. In this case the explanatory factor is God or what is called The God Hypothesis. Apriorian claims God Exists and that because He Exists as God He is the author of all things. There remains only one option available to us, add value to the things of God, or create enmity between Him and us. If we are against God we are against the things of God. This is witness as competition. To compete one or two persons must compete with the rightful owner or with another false claimant to what does not belong to either. To solve human problems is simply a matter of not creating them. Conservatives are organizations that reward cooperation and prevent competitions from occurring. Thus all human social problems are simultaneously eliminated.
There are two systems of thought or ideologies, that reflect two philosophies or epistemologies as to the nature of knowledge. If our view as to what knowledge is are wrong, the truth is far from us.
The One Reality Hypothesis postulates a single all-encompassing universe that is known only through the physical sense. This is the phenomenologists position.
The Two Reality Hypothesis acknowledges there is an epistemology that contains all logical possibilities but one. The excluded hypothesis is the proposition that the universe is composed of absolute truths. Logically there cannot be more than two possible Theories of Knowledge, nor can there be fewer than one, as the one is needed and includes all logical possibilities, but one other. Thus, the one philosophy is logically necessary and the two reality hypothesis is sufficient to include all possible viewpoints.
In The Two Universe model, one universe contains all possible ideas and viewpoints, other than the idea that truth is formed from logical absolutes. As the idea of a reality composed of contingent truths is incompatible with a reality of absolutes, a reality composed of analytical truths cannot be contained in one that is composed of a posteriori truth. The two realities are logical contradictions and therefore produce two totally different understanding of knowledge.
If there is only one knowable reality, absolute truth statements are not tenable. The One Reality Hypothesis must exclude all absolute statements and all metaphysical propositions. This statement is an absolute truth and is metaphysical in its construction. But we do understand it even though its construction is at odds with the proposition there are no absolute knowable truths.
The claim no absolute truths are knowable cannot be deduced from the One Reality Hypothesis. The One Reality Hypothesis contradicts its own premise, namely that it is all-inclusive. In fact, the One Reality Hypothesis cannot contain its own definition. The definition of the One Reality Hypothesis is a metaphysical construct and not admissible by the standards it establishes for what is knowable or permissible.
All true propositions are absolute truths. That which is not true is false. The claim there is no absolute truth, is a proposition that claims no class of propositions exist that is without at least one exception. This is an absolute truth claim. This claim is not permissible under the rules laid down by the One Reality Hypothesis. Statements that have no exceptions, are not compatible with The One Reality Hypothesis. The One Reality Hypothesis posits or represents, a logical impossibility. The One Reality Hypothesis permits of no absolute truths. Therefore, the conclusion must be, there are two incompatible and logical contradictory, Theories of Knowledge.
One reality or knowledge system is composed of relative statements, ideas and concepts. The truths of liberal reality are contingent, probabilistic and relative. The truths of The One Reality Hypothesis always contain an element of doubt and by extension, error. There is no moral perfection possible within the liberal conception of life.
The other Theory of Knowledge or reality construct is the reality that contains logical truth. It excludes all synthetic statements made by The One Reality Hypothesis in a category of things called lies. In a reality in which absolutes are possible, moral perfection becomes possible.
To Summarize:
· The One Reality Hypothesis includes all narratives other than belief there are two realities.
· The One Reality Hypothesis (ORH) rejects the claims of the Two Reality Hypothesis (TRH).
· Two Reality Hypothesis affirms part truth exists as lies.
· The TRH postulates a false and contradictory reality composed of synthetic statements and a posteriori reasoning exists as a belief held by those who reject God.
· The TRH also postulates there is an analytical reality based on logical thought and a priori statements arrived at deductively.
· The TRH embraces metaphysics, and logic and the possibility of moral perfection.
· The Two Reality Hypothesis, postulates God Exists is a foundational axiom and the most basic analytical claim.
· The two realities have and must have two disparate ideas on rights and the exercise of power.
· The TRH postulates labor has an absolute moral right to the value it creates and absolute moral authority over this value.
· Those who hold to the ethical ideas derived from the ORH believe there are no natural rights to authority. Position is determined by competitions.
· The Six Moral Maxims state:
o No one is entitled to what others have.
o No one is entitled to the service of another.
o No one is obligated to anyone else.
o No one must pay the cost of others.
o We have a right only to what we create.
o We have absolute authority over the value we create.
The power of the state justifies its costs, including taxation, unemployment, poverty and pollution, by its capacity to allay fear. Without the regulatory power of the state there are no social costs, without social costs there is no fear. Without its regulatory power the state cannot externalize its costs onto others. Where there are social costs there is no justice. When we have justice there is no need for the state. In short, the state creates social costs and uses the existence of social cost to justify itself and its power.
The Apriorian Thesis
There is nothing that puzzles mankind more than the existence of evil. How can a Perfect God create evil? But these problems are of our own making. God is not the only creator. It says God created all things and on the seventh day, He rested. But mankind existed by then and mankind did not rest. All we need to understand to solve the dilemma of evil, is to know God does not lie, what God Created is Good. Man cannot turn the Good God does, into evil.
Scientific solutions to every problem based on Apologetics, the meta-science